• Right Place Photo Caption Contest Hall of Glory Top 25

    meister.jpeg About Me
    BlogmeisterUSA's Guidelines for Commenting
    My Blog at Newsbusters
    My Writings at Family Security Matters
    My Writings at The American Thinker
    I Also Blog at Lifelike Pundits
    National Summary Interviews Me
    Read "The Americans" by Gordon Sinclair
    PELOSI_DEMOCRAT_TREASON-1.jpg More About the Fighting 101st Keyboardists
    fighting101s.jpg


October 31, 2007

Last Night's Dem Debate: Hillary Tanks?

No, I didn't see the debate...I was in New York for a screening of "Hillary! Uncensored," but my pal Tim sent a link to Roger Simon's take on Mrs. Clinton's performance at Politico:

It was not just that her answer about whether illegal immigrants should be issued drivers licenses was at best incomprehensible and at worst misleading.

It was that for two hours she dodged and weaved, parsed and stonewalled.

And when it was over, both the Barack Obama and John Edwards campaigns signaled that in the weeks ahead they intend to hammer home a simple message: Hillary Clinton does not say what she means or mean what she says.

But isn't that what she does best? Never say what you really mean, lest the voters really know what you stand for. And when the going gets tough, deny, deny, deny.

The "Hillary! Uncensored" documentary was a real eye-opener as far as the whole Peter Paul Hollywood fundraiser in August of 2000 is concerned. She and Bill used Paul because it was convenient, and then left him out to dry when the press asked a few uncomfortable questions. I plan to write more about it later. But I will say now that I am looking forward to his civil suit against the Clintons, which I was told will go to trial some time next year.

071030_clinton_stern.jpeg

Think this is bad? Her performance was even worse.

Show Comments

Posted by Pam Meister at 09:00 AM | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0) | Say NO to Hillary!
Comments

I didn't see the debate, either, but Good Morning America was even criticizing Clinton for her cryptic answers.

Posted by: Wyatt Earp at October 31, 2007 09:17 AM

When GMA criticizes Mrs. Clinton, you know she must be in trouble! I wonder if the Today Show was as critical? Her pals on the View, as worldly wise as they are, will stick up for her no matter what...

Posted by: Pam at October 31, 2007 09:28 AM

I hope the Peter Paul issue goes to court at the most optimum time possible to knock Her Royal Pantsuit on her a$$. Permanently. She's gotten away with every miserable corrupt thing she and "The Would Be First Gent" have pulled, and it's about time she was held accountable.

All the better if it fatally damages her bid for the White House. Oh, sweet glory....

Looking forward to reading your review of the documentary.

Andrea

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 31, 2007 10:20 AM

Dream on.

Posted by: mudkitty at October 31, 2007 01:14 PM


    ENDORSEMENTS "Your stupid requirements for commenting, whatever they are, mean I'll not read you again." ~ "Duke Martin", Oraculations
    "One of the worst sites I've read." ~ Frank A. Niedospial