October 06, 2008
Sean Hannity on Obama's Radical Friends
See it before Obama's Truth Squad gets to YouTube:
Show Comments »
Shame on Sean Hannity for giving a platform to Andy Martin, and shame on you for repeating his drivel here. For those of you not familiar with him, he is most recently famous to have drummed up the whole "Obama is a Muslim" bs, and he has a long history of holocaust denial, extreme public anti-semitism, and has filed so many frivolous lawsuits that he is no longer allowed to sue anyone. This is a man who literally ran for public office with a platform that included exterminating Jew power in America. Maybe he's telling the truth, and maybe he's not -- but I'm personally not going to take his word on what constitutes "extremism".
Posted by: Ro at October 7, 2008 12:26 PMYou should listen to Sean Hannity before taking the other posters stance. He is no way an extremist. I listen to him every day and he gives the American public truth about all politicians. I have never heard Hannity make any of these claims that the poster said, so I wonder when he is listening to him? I also want to encourage you all to watch and learn from the program Obama and his Radical Friends. They have actual proof of these things.
Posted by: Paige at October 7, 2008 08:21 PMPaige -- Hannity gave a public platform to a known anti-semite, holocaust-denier, and general liar. This guy's name is Andy Martin. He is in the second YouTube clip. I couldn't watch past when he came on (because I refuse to give him any time), so I don't know how much of the show he takes up. If you don't believe me, by all means, look up "Andy Martin". He's just awful, and I just thought those who were reading this should know what kind of people Hannity is getting his info from.
Posted by: Ro at October 8, 2008 01:32 PMPaige,Ro, et al:
The issue is NOT whether Andy Martin is an
a*****e (he is) the issue is whether the claims
Hannity makes about Obama are accurate or not.
God Bless Hannity for bringing this to light. He is the first and only reporter, that I am aware of, who is doing his job of reporting information to the public. We need more reporting of this nature instead of the current "movie star" gloss overs we're getting from others. Thanks, Hannity, I sent this to hundreds of folks.
Posted by: Sandra at October 12, 2008 10:15 PMFirst of all, Hannity is not a reporter. He is not a journalist. I know because I have a degree in Journalism (unlike Sarah Palin, mine's from a University that is nationally recognized in that field and it only took me 4 years to get it). What Hannrity is, is a sensationalist (read: National Enquirer). If he is anything, he is a propagandist. But Journalist? I hardly think so.
Posted by: Alexandra at October 12, 2008 10:46 PMBut Fredo, if all this is really true, why is it that Hannity was unable to get a group of people that didn't include a total a*****e liar bigot to back him up? How would you react if -- however true the information -- someone super lefty (say, Olberman) got, say, Ayers onto TV to tell us all how crazy McCain was? Would you believe what he said? Why use a known liar to make your point? Why give him credence by allowing him a platform?
Posted by: Ro at October 13, 2008 03:52 PM
